[Homer Falcon]

Originally Posted by bethere

a funny thing, our racist southern democratic friends are now all republicans. so those democratic racists are now all republican racists. you courted them and they came running into your open arms.

1) Don jockey suit.
2) Secure lantern, and sit by the road.
3) Exorcise self-loathing guilt.
4) Light a smoke

You will thank me later.

[QuakerOats]

Originally Posted by fish82

Deflection, strawman, and ad hominem all in one post. You're on fire. :rolleyes:

Hey...I post, you respond. How fun is that? :cool:

Classic, yet fresh. :)

[bethere]

Originally Posted by buckeyedan

too funny...
you acknowledge the facts (they were southern DEMOCRATES)... then just decided they would now be republicans just because...

you ever try standup?

and all I have to do to get you to stop answering or let everyone understand how you will REFUSE to answer:

14th amendment... proposed by congress on June 13, 1866...
that congress had 70% republicans in the house and 75% in the senate

northern states... controlled by republicans... easily ratified it... southern states, at the time totally dominated by democrates... struggled to

so how again are you claiming an amendment proposed by a congres over 70% republican was "opposed" by those same republicans?

I'll wait for your typical ignoring of the question and making personal attacks...

dude. in the 1960's the gop was in a SERIOUS minority in the congress. they didn't control ANYTHING.

as for the 1800's? that republican party died with the nixon southern strategy. the democratic party in the 1800's was almost completely regional. that party only elected one guy president--grover cleveland-- between buchanon in the 1850's and wilson in 1912. it was one party government all of the way. liberals argued with conservatives in the gop caucus. then they passed whatever they wanted to pass with no problems at all.

when you grow up you might be formidable. but at the moment? you are EASY.

REPUBLICANES IN GENERAL ARE EASY. THEY HAVE TOO MUCH FALSE TRASH THEY HAVE TO DEFEND. PLEASE MAKE A NOTE OF IT.

[QuakerOats]

Originally Posted by bethere

AG Holder vows to enforce federal Voting Rights Act in dispute over Texas photo ID requirement

Interesting ---- actual registered voters with ID's show up to vote, and are allowed to be intimidated by The New Black Panther Party and Eric 'The Racist' Holder. And now, Holder vows to force a state to allow illegal fraudulent voters to cast ballots for the obama regime. This is the same racist who oversaw the criminal Fast & Furious program and whom should be imprisoned today because of it.

It is becomer clearer everday that with the election of obama our government has been infiltrated with the most anti-states rights, anti-U.S. constitution, and anti-American group of radical leftists in our nation's history.

November '12 cannot arrive soon enough.

[bethere]

Originally Posted by QuakerOats

Interesting ---- actual registered voters with ID's show up to vote, and are allowed to be intimidated by The New Black Panther Party and Eric 'The Racist' Holder. And now, Holder vows to force a state to allow illegal fraudulent voters to cast ballots for the obama regime. This is the same racist who oversaw the criminal Fast & Furious program and whom should be imprisoned today because of it.

It is becomer clearer everday that with the election of obama our government has been infiltrated with the most anti-states rights, anti-U.S. constitution, and anti-American group of radical leftists in our nation's history.

November '12 cannot arrive soon enough.

we're going to enforce the voting rights act--which rush claims to be a republicane masterpiece--and pummel you in november,

lord knows how you can take credit for it's passage on one hand and then scream about it being unconstitutional on the other.

schizophrenia? i only had psych 101 so that is not my call. but i aced psych 101.. so i'm thinking republicanes are nuts.

btw.. my friend clarence brown senior came off of his flipping death bed to push the voting rights act out of the ways and means committee. he was a republican, also from ohio.

what happened to the gop?

[majorspark]

The democrat party just got a little wiser in how they use black Americans. Instead of economic liberty they give them dependency. They no longer pick cotton for them. They cast votes. Their masters no longer house them in shacks on their plantations, but in the projects in the ghettos of their inner cities. "House slaves" like Jackson, Sharpton, Maxine Waters, etc get better accommodations managing the production of votes.

I hope black Americans come to the realization that they have a wealth of opportunity in this country. They have so many individual skills and values they can be quite successful in the free market. Those that have broken free of the shackles of dependency and don't toe the line, well they are labeled "Uncle Toms".

[Homer Falcon]

Originally Posted by majorspark

The democrat party just got a little wiser in how they use black Americans. Instead of economic liberty they give them dependency. They no longer pick cotton for them. They cast votes. Their masters no longer house them in shacks on their plantations, but in the projects in the ghettos of their inner cities. "House slaves" like Jackson, Sharpton, Maxine Waters, etc get better accommodations managing the production of votes.

I hope black Americans come to the realization that they have a wealth of opportunity in this country. They have so many individual skills and values they can be quite successful in the free market. Those that have broken free of the shackles of dependency and don't toe the line, well they are labeled "Uncle Toms".

Mitt approves of this message.

With nerves of steel, he walked into the lion's den just today.

It was intense. Thankfully, he walked away with hardly a scratch!

[bethere]

Originally Posted by majorspark

The democrat party just got a little wiser in how they use black Americans. Instead of economic liberty they give them dependency. They no longer pick cotton for them. They cast votes. Their masters no longer house them in shacks on their plantations, but in the projects in the ghettos of their inner cities. "House slaves" like Jackson, Sharpton, Maxine Waters, etc get better accommodations managing the production of votes.

I hope black Americans come to the realization that they have a wealth of opportunity in this country. They have so many individual skills and values they can be quite successful in the free market. Those that have broken free of the shackles of dependency and don't toe the line, well they are labeled "Uncle Toms".

did you hear the NAACP convention laughing at romney today?

whatever it is you want from them, it isn't going to happen anytime soon.

lol.

[bethere]

Originally Posted by Homer Falcon

1) Don jockey suit.
2) Secure lantern, and sit by the road.
3) Exorcise self-loathing guilt.
4) Light a smoke

You will thank me later.

a house in my neighborhood had a set of those racist jockeys. we were sitting around my house drinking beers and one of my friends said to me (this was in the 1970's and in retrospect it was shockingly like the 70's show), 'let's paint the boys!"

we had lots of spray paint sitting around and we were in the right mood so off we went, but before we left one of them said, "why don't you ask your mom?'

i said, 'what? you don't think mom would approve?"

so we all went upstairs and asked my mom.

she said, "don't get caught."


i miss her more than anything.

[Zunardo]

I'm seeing a parallel with the Ohio school funding process. The Ohio Supreme Court ruled it unconstitutional, yet the process is allowed to continue because nobody can figure out any other way to assure the schools will get at least some money......... and it still goes on after how many years?

Suppose the US Supreme Court rules the Texas Voter ID law to be unconstitutional - and yet allows it to continue - becase nobody can figure out a way to assure only registered voters are allowed to cast a ballot...... and nothing changes the Texas law continues to be in force for several more years after President Rice serves her two four-year terms?

Could it happen?

[bethere]

Originally Posted by Zunardo

I'm seeing a parallel with the Ohio school funding process. The Ohio Supreme Court ruled it unconstitutional, yet the process is allowed to continue because nobody can figure out any other way to assure the schools will get at least some money......... and it still goes on after how many years?

Suppose the US Supreme Court rules the Texas Voter ID law to be unconstitutional - and yet allows it to continue - becase nobody can figure out a way to assure only registered voters are allowed to cast a ballot...... and nothing changes the Texas law continues to be in force for several more years after President Rice serves her two four-year terms?

Could it happen?

you lose credibility in the gop when you scrub voters lists and scratch three legitimate long term voters for every one that has moved. the voter id bit is an extension of that. working people don't have as much surplus time to run around getting these documents before the election. they have bigger fish to fry than politics. many city people don't know how to drive. move to nyc and find that out quickly. you push this in the ay the gop is pushing it only to disenfranchise voters.

why not require a tractor license? no one in the city would have that.

the gop openly opposes the voting rights act, many think that women and 18 year olds shouldn't vote, and most get offended when we call it a democracy. they correct us by calling it a republic and in so doing they also betray their true intentions.

most in the gop would have us not vote for senate and argue for the electoral college at every opportunity.


there is only one reason you would do all of that and it is entirely unethical. it is also a violation of the 1965 voting rights act. that act stipulates that these plans must be approved by the justice department. they haven't been, and for good reason.

the party chair from pennsylvania just admitted as much. he said his job of electing romney was done.

a truly evil man. romney should admonish him and holder should prosecute him.

he just committed thousands of voter fraud violations.


if democracy is good enough for iraq it is good enough for america. to heck with the id, let me stain my thumb like an iraqi.

[majorspark]

Originally Posted by bethere

did you hear the NAACP convention laughing at romney today?

I did take the time to listen to his speech and I would not characterize it as you have. You should take the time as well. 20+ minutes of your time. Here it is as I listened to it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAhJh0ADd9k

Though many likely disagreed with Mitt, most respected his thoughts. Most times they gave mild applause to his ideas (no they were not jumping out of their chairs), on occasion vocal minorities booed and hissed.

Originally Posted by bethere

whatever it is you want from them, it isn't going to happen anytime soon.

Individual freedom and the belief in themselves that as individuals with their own talents and merits they can be successful in the free market. That is what I want. I agree this will take time given their past history. Unfortunately some seek to use the past to keep them in present bonds.

The iron hand of government is strengthened by the fear of its people. Good or bad be wary of it.

[QuakerOats]

Originally Posted by bethere

did you hear the NAACP convention laughing at romney today?

What do you expect from a group that makes its living off the phony promotion of non-existent racism? How ironic that a group that claims to side with blacks helps to cause blacks to remain slaves .....to the government. How sick and twisted is that.

But, it does prove once again, that liberalism always generates the exact opposite of its stated intent.

[buckeyedan]

Originally Posted by QuakerOats

What do you expect from a group that makes its living off the phony promotion of non-existent racism? How ironic that a group that claims to side with blacks helps to cause blacks to remain slaves .....to the government. How sick and twisted is that.

But, it does prove once again, that liberalism always generates the exact opposite of its stated intent.

I agree...
as some point you will hope groups like this will stop keeping their own groups down for their own purpose
if there is equality those folks have no power... do you think their goal is equality or their own power?
you are right... their own power - which requires them to keep their own group down

Originally Posted by bethere

dude. in the 1960's the gop was in a SERIOUS minority in the congress. they didn't control ANYTHING.

as for the 1800's? that republican party died with the nixon southern strategy. the democratic party in the 1800's was almost completely regional. that party only elected one guy president--grover cleveland-- between buchanon in the 1850's and wilson in 1912. it was one party government all of the way. liberals argued with conservatives in the gop caucus. then they passed whatever they wanted to pass with no problems at all.

when you grow up you might be formidable. but at the moment? you are EASY.

REPUBLICANES IN GENERAL ARE EASY. THEY HAVE TOO MUCH FALSE TRASH THEY HAVE TO DEFEND. PLEASE MAKE A NOTE OF IT.

1960s... 14th amendment... sigh... history wasn't your strong subject was it
I mean pick up a book and read it and maybe you wouldn't make such flat false statements?
not that you care about truth...

what I said was fact... documented an presented
what you said was nonsense and completely false...

so yea... if truth is not an issue you are making a fine arguement... sigh

Originally Posted by Zunardo

I'm seeing a parallel with the Ohio school funding process. The Ohio Supreme Court ruled it unconstitutional, yet the process is allowed to continue because nobody can figure out any other way to assure the schools will get at least some money......... and it still goes on after how many years?

Suppose the US Supreme Court rules the Texas Voter ID law to be unconstitutional - and yet allows it to continue - becase nobody can figure out a way to assure only registered voters are allowed to cast a ballot...... and nothing changes the Texas law continues to be in force for several more years after President Rice serves her two four-year terms?

Could it happen?

probably...
my fear is that the more the court rules in these matters that they then can't do anything about
the more folks like Obama just ignor laws
the more you wil have folks realize the Supreme Courts oppinion on laws is no more meaningful constitutionally that your's or mine... they have no power to enfore their oppinion unless the other branches just go along

again... beating the dead horse
the founders punted on two issues they could not agree on: Slavery and Judicial Review

both will likly lead to civil wars to reshape how we are governed
you simply can't leave major issues like that dividing a nation unsolved when you create a government

[east_ohio]

Originally Posted by QuakerOats

What do you expect from a group that makes its living off the phony promotion of non-existent racism? How ironic that a group that claims to side with blacks helps to cause blacks to remain slaves .....to the government. How sick and twisted is that.

But, it does prove once again, that liberalism always generates the exact opposite of its stated intent.

This has to rank as my favorite post reply of all time. How accurate and how can anyone deny this truth.

[SBFAMILY]

They keep going against the majority again !http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ...discrimination

[docthehun]

Originally Posted by bethere

a house in my neighborhood had a set of those racist jockeys. we were sitting around my house drinking beers and one of my friends said to me (this was in the 1970's and in retrospect it was shockingly like the 70's show), 'let's paint the boys!"

we had lots of spray paint sitting around and we were in the right mood so off we went, but before we left one of them said, "why don't you ask your mom?'

i said, 'what? you don't think mom would approve?"

so we all went upstairs and asked my mom.

she said, "don't get caught."


i miss her more than anything.

Moms tend to do that to a guy. Like many things in life, we don't appreciate what we've got until it goes away. Death is the price we pay for getting to live, so don't waste a moment. I sympathize.

[Zunardo]

Originally Posted by bethere

if democracy is good enough for iraq it is good enough for america. to heck with the id, let me stain my thumb like an iraqi.

Okay, I'll go in with you on this, and it makes a nice bi-partisan photo op - say cheese! But, waitjustadarnminit, that just takes care of preventing me from voting for the same Kurd twice. How do the Iraqis know I'm even registered in their precinct, let alone registered at all? Might I not even be entitled to a blue digit? They wouldn't ask me to show any papers, would they?

The tractor license requirement is a nice touch - I'd be hard-pressed to steer a combine in a straight line on the simulated South 40 course, and I'd probably wash out on the written exam anyway.

However - what if the Texas law is ruled unconstitutional? Do they leave the current system in place until a better system of validating voters comes along? Do they scrap it and get out of the way of the stampede on Election Day while singing "My Kind Of Town, Chicago Is"?

[DGUtley]

I reiterate: Given that all we need an ID for in this country, how is it wrong to require one to vote?

[bethere]

Originally Posted by DGUtley

I reiterate: Given that all we need an ID for in this country, how is it wrong to require one to vote?

and as we have been saying all along make it easier and free to get that mandatory document and we would have no problem with doing this. unfortunately the game is to make it as hard as possible to do so that 'slacker' democrats won't vote.

why does the gop hate democracy?